<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: another palmer in downtown?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/</link>
	<description>Downtown Los Angeles Blog: Restaurants, Retail, Culture, Events, Lofts, News.  Rich Alossi, Author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:28:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: please be serious</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-2/#comment-28483</link>
		<dc:creator>please be serious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-28483</guid>
		<description>Ok everyone. Please be serious and honest here. If you do not like Palmer then that is your constitutional right and your freedom to express yourself. 

But let&#039;s all face it. LA is a toilet. It always has been and it always will be. There is big business in those bi towers, but at the end of the day it is a toilet. 

Where did all those homeless people go that used to set up small neighborhood type cardboard homes in fron of the Ronald Reagon Building, or the Trade center. Those people found job? They are not homeless any longer? No they were pushed away to the outskirts. 

Thank god there is something nice to live in in Downtown. Thank god you can now actually walk outside without get approached by thiefs, muggars, homeless people. 

It is projects like these that make neighborhoods more successful, more attractive, and more safe. 

Just like downtown Anaheim, Brea, Bella Terra in Huntington Beach. All of these places were toilets like LA. Thanks to proper high end development they are now attractive and good paying, upscale people with money and good credit scores now finally occupy this neighborhood. 

I hope Palmer builds more. We need more people like Palmer. He should run for Govenor. He would get my vote. 

You should all stop being envious of his success and his tranformation of a downtown toilet to a masterpiece. 

Thank you Mr. Palmer. Keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok everyone. Please be serious and honest here. If you do not like Palmer then that is your constitutional right and your freedom to express&nbsp;yourself. </p>
<p>But let&#8217;s all face it. LA is a toilet. It always has been and it always will be. There is big business in those bi towers, but at the end of the day it is a&nbsp;toilet. </p>
<p>Where did all those homeless people go that used to set up small neighborhood type cardboard homes in fron of the Ronald Reagon Building, or the Trade center. Those people found job? They are not homeless any longer? No they were pushed away to the&nbsp;outskirts. </p>
<p>Thank god there is something nice to live in in Downtown. Thank god you can now actually walk outside without get approached by thiefs, muggars, homeless&nbsp;people. </p>
<p>It is projects like these that make neighborhoods more successful, more attractive, and more&nbsp;safe. </p>
<p>Just like downtown Anaheim, Brea, Bella Terra in Huntington Beach. All of these places were toilets like LA. Thanks to proper high end development they are now attractive and good paying, upscale people with money and good credit scores now finally occupy this&nbsp;neighborhood. </p>
<p>I hope Palmer builds more. We need more people like Palmer. He should run for Govenor. He would get my&nbsp;vote. </p>
<p>You should all stop being envious of his success and his tranformation of a downtown toilet to a&nbsp;masterpiece. </p>
<p>Thank you Mr. Palmer. Keep up the great&nbsp;work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-2/#comment-25066</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-25066</guid>
		<description>BBQ King was AWFUL.  I went there twice and both times the meat was chewy, the sauce was unexceptional and the side dishes were bland and tasteless.  I will not go to their new location.  The dumpy ugly building they tore down was a cinder block bunker former gas station, a hideous nightmare of a structure.  

N EXT!

P.S. I do wish Palmer had been forced to move that last Queen Anne house to Heritage Square where it could have been restored.  Would have been a nice capper to their collection of buildings.  Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBQ King was AWFUL.  I went there twice and both times the meat was chewy, the sauce was unexceptional and the side dishes were bland and tasteless.  I will not go to their new location.  The dumpy ugly building they tore down was a cinder block bunker former gas station, a hideous nightmare of a&nbsp;structure.  </p>
<p>N&nbsp;EXT!</p>
<p>P.S. I do wish Palmer had been forced to move that last Queen Anne house to Heritage Square where it could have been restored.  Would have been a nice capper to their collection of buildings.  Oh&nbsp;well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-2/#comment-24896</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-24896</guid>
		<description>Good point. What&#039;s another ugly building in a city filled with them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. What&#8217;s another ugly building in a city filled with&nbsp;them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: celia</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-2/#comment-24848</link>
		<dc:creator>celia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-24848</guid>
		<description>there is beauty in imperfection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is beauty in&nbsp;imperfection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Always A Party</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-2/#comment-24847</link>
		<dc:creator>Always A Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-24847</guid>
		<description>Hey Mary, relax. The buildings are ugly. There are ugly buildings all over LA County. Have you been to Burbank lately? Ugly happens. Unless you want to build your own buildings to your personal taste, learn to avert your eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mary, relax. The buildings are ugly. There are ugly buildings all over LA County. Have you been to Burbank lately? Ugly happens. Unless you want to build your own buildings to your personal taste, learn to avert your&nbsp;eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-2/#comment-24843</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-24843</guid>
		<description>#22 and 23 - Anything is NOT better than nothing. A vacant lot represents the potential to develop something exceptional. Giant, faux-fortresses with skimpy styrofoam details and no sidewalk presence represents a wasted opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#22 and 23 - Anything is NOT better than nothing. A vacant lot represents the potential to develop something exceptional. Giant, faux-fortresses with skimpy styrofoam details and no sidewalk presence represents a wasted&nbsp;opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-2/#comment-24836</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-24836</guid>
		<description>@Tamara: sunset turns into cesar e. chavez  ( or visa versa ) @ the figueroa intersection hope this helps.  Also BBQ king was ugly but delicious and provided something for the neighborhood.  It was constantly populated and provided a public space of sorts with its outdoor seating and parking lot.  

-----------------------------------------------------------

The problem with the retail space in the orsini is a few reasons, primarily the fact that any buisness you run just looks like the orsini.  I don&#039;t see a place for signage or major aesthetic changes so anyone driving by will just think its apartments. If i was investing money in opening a new restaurant or coffee shop, i don&#039;t want faux italian architecture with dark windows and brick arches to be my only option. 

As far as downtown haters, it&#039;s fine let people say its dirty or ugly, I rather live in a community that has affection for its surroundings then try and convert people living in glendale or sherman oaks that downtown is worth moving to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tamara: sunset turns into cesar e. chavez  ( or visa versa ) @ the figueroa intersection hope this helps.  Also BBQ king was ugly but delicious and provided something for the neighborhood.  It was constantly populated and provided a public space of sorts with its outdoor seating and parking&nbsp;lot.  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>The problem with the retail space in the orsini is a few reasons, primarily the fact that any buisness you run just looks like the orsini.  I don&#8217;t see a place for signage or major aesthetic changes so anyone driving by will just think its apartments. If i was investing money in opening a new restaurant or coffee shop, i don&#8217;t want faux italian architecture with dark windows and brick arches to be my only&nbsp;option. </p>
<p>As far as downtown haters, it&#8217;s fine let people say its dirty or ugly, I rather live in a community that has affection for its surroundings then try and convert people living in glendale or sherman oaks that downtown is worth moving&nbsp;to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasia</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-2/#comment-24833</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-24833</guid>
		<description>BBQ King does not have a full kitchen at their 7th street location... so unfortunately you cannot get things like french fries. My understanding is that everything is prepared at their South LA location.

I agree Phillips is probably the best BBQ in LA and there is also Smokehouse down the way and their fries are amazing... I will check out Mr. Cecil&#039;s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBQ King does not have a full kitchen at their 7th street location&#8230; so unfortunately you cannot get things like french fries. My understanding is that everything is prepared at their South LA&nbsp;location.</p>
<p>I agree Phillips is probably the best BBQ in LA and there is also Smokehouse down the way and their fries are amazing&#8230; I will check out Mr.&nbsp;Cecil&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douche bag suit</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-2/#comment-24832</link>
		<dc:creator>douche bag suit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-24832</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan of  Palmer&#039;s design but his product is VERY well built and he pays extreme attention to detail in his builidngs.  He also provides very nice amenities that appeal to many types of people.  This is why his projects are all essentially full and genrate some of the highest PSF rents in all of DTLA.  I haven&#039;t seen anyone criticizing his design point to anything built in DTLA as an example of something better.  

I think we&#039;d all love to see the retail full but full of what?  The locations he&#039;s chosen are pioneering for new development.  Look across the streets and there isn&#039;t shit.  Also, many, many retailers don&#039;t have any desire to take the space for virtually free becasue the retail is so poorly designed.  The city required something for which there really is no demand.  There are plenty of much better retail locations in DTLA.  

The &quot;historic&quot; Queen Anne he tore town was a boarded up crack house he couldn&#039;t give away because it was in such poor condition.  There was absolutely nothing worth salvaging and the fact that the city and the hysterical conservancy tried to make him salvage it is ridiculous (especially if you consider the hypocracy that the city and the CRA are respnsible for tearing down an entire neighborhood full of historic Victoians when they redeveloped Bunker Hill).  

My understanding is he also tried pretty hard to fit a small grocery store chain into the Orsini III (not TJ&#039;s) but that to do it he would have lost an entire floor of units becasue the city wouldn&#039;t give him a variance of a few feet in height (the grocery need higher ceilings than the original design).  

BTW - The BQ King was decent BBQ, nothing more.  Head down to Philip&#039;s in Leimert Park or Mr. Cecil&#039;s at Pico an Bundy for two FAR superior establishments.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, I ate at BB King frequently (and it absolutely destroys the Spring St Smoke House) but it always made me wish I had the time or ambition to go to another BBQ joint.  Do they actually do any smoking at the 7th St location?  Looks too small and I haven&#039;t seen/smelled the smoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of  Palmer&#8217;s design but his product is VERY well built and he pays extreme attention to detail in his builidngs.  He also provides very nice amenities that appeal to many types of people.  This is why his projects are all essentially full and genrate some of the highest PSF rents in all of DTLA.  I haven&#8217;t seen anyone criticizing his design point to anything built in DTLA as an example of something&nbsp;better.  </p>
<p>I think we&#8217;d all love to see the retail full but full of what?  The locations he&#8217;s chosen are pioneering for new development.  Look across the streets and there isn&#8217;t shit.  Also, many, many retailers don&#8217;t have any desire to take the space for virtually free becasue the retail is so poorly designed.  The city required something for which there really is no demand.  There are plenty of much better retail locations in&nbsp;DTLA.  </p>
<p>The &#8220;historic&#8221; Queen Anne he tore town was a boarded up crack house he couldn&#8217;t give away because it was in such poor condition.  There was absolutely nothing worth salvaging and the fact that the city and the hysterical conservancy tried to make him salvage it is ridiculous (especially if you consider the hypocracy that the city and the CRA are respnsible for tearing down an entire neighborhood full of historic Victoians when they redeveloped Bunker&nbsp;Hill).  </p>
<p>My understanding is he also tried pretty hard to fit a small grocery store chain into the Orsini III (not TJ&#8217;s) but that to do it he would have lost an entire floor of units becasue the city wouldn&#8217;t give him a variance of a few feet in height (the grocery need higher ceilings than the original&nbsp;design).  </p>
<p>BTW - The BQ King was decent BBQ, nothing more.  Head down to Philip&#8217;s in Leimert Park or Mr. Cecil&#8217;s at Pico an Bundy for two FAR superior establishments.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I ate at BB King frequently (and it absolutely destroys the Spring St Smoke House) but it always made me wish I had the time or ambition to go to another BBQ joint.  Do they actually do any smoking at the 7th St location?  Looks too small and I haven&#8217;t seen/smelled the&nbsp;smoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Noyes-More</title>
		<link>http://www.angelenic.com/6525/another-palmer-in-downtown/comment-page-1/#comment-24830</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Noyes-More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angelenic.com/?p=6525#comment-24830</guid>
		<description>Goodness&gt; NYC is dirty and crumbling. SF is dirty as well. Cities are dirty. Chicago is dirty too. I know these three cities well. I can give you street-by-street, neighborhood by neighbood of these cities. LA is dirty too. SOOOOOOOOO What! At least DTLA is building, recreating itself, and holding on to good historical buildings...thanks in large part to Gilmore (Bless you)- and the DT urban pioneers and investors like BERT GREEN. I don&#039;t ever agree with everything and everyone but to think somehow other cities are cleaner than LA is silly or that the architecture is better is simply unture. Even the Near North in Chicago has major problems. How about the West side of Chicago, OMG dirty!

If you dislike our city, its history and vision there are lots of other places to be. I thank God for the people that have put their lives, talent, and fortune in the historical heart and start of Los Angeles, DOWNTOWN. I don&#039;t especially like the architecture of the lets say, Orsini, but thank goodness they are here. And to &quot;Nerd&quot;, grow up.-Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness&gt; NYC is dirty and crumbling. SF is dirty as well. Cities are dirty. Chicago is dirty too. I know these three cities well. I can give you street-by-street, neighborhood by neighbood of these cities. LA is dirty too. SOOOOOOOOO What! At least DTLA is building, recreating itself, and holding on to good historical buildings&#8230;thanks in large part to Gilmore (Bless you)- and the DT urban pioneers and investors like BERT GREEN. I don&#8217;t ever agree with everything and everyone but to think somehow other cities are cleaner than LA is silly or that the architecture is better is simply unture. Even the Near North in Chicago has major problems. How about the West side of Chicago, OMG&nbsp;dirty!</p>
<p>If you dislike our city, its history and vision there are lots of other places to be. I thank God for the people that have put their lives, talent, and fortune in the historical heart and start of Los Angeles, DOWNTOWN. I don&#8217;t especially like the architecture of the lets say, Orsini, but thank goodness they are here. And to &#8220;Nerd&#8221;, grow&nbsp;up.-Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
  
